Hey @vismay , appreciate your reply.
Quick thing to clarify: With the questions that are written underneath the sections, they were not intended as questions to be answered right away, but rather as guiding questions for our decision making process. Sorry for not being clear enough on that ;)
So whenever we face a new Project eg. "building roads", we would determine what the objective/purpose is, who is leading the project, what are the financial projections for the project etc.
Whenever we issue new lots we would have to decide on how many lots, what their valuation is, what the requirements are etc.
Same applies to the other sections.
I intended to give an overview about my perspective of how to approach a decision in any given section. I hope I could make that clearer now.
Let's make it applicable with the escrow vs direct transfer decision. This would be a "project" which requires someone who leads the conversation (a "responsible") who gathers all the information and the proposal including all implications.
Coming back to the question from before: For this "project" we can then apply guiding question that could be the same for any project, as in Q1: "What is the purpose of this project?" Answer might be: "To guarantee a secure and cost effective way to purchase the land within 'Florestral Land Expansion Phase 1'"; Q2: "What are the financial fundamentals for this project"....
Any project would therefore start with a LEAD (someone who takes it), for the "Escrow Project" I would suggest @vismay or @oran as you have already looked into it. With having the LEAD does not mean to take all the workload on oneself but rather to initiate and to take it further.
Blessings,